Anna Huusko

3D-tulostus tutuksi opettajille

3D-tulostus tutuksi opettajille

LUT-yliopistolla järjestettiin lokakuussa 3D-tulostuksen kaksipäiväinen koulutus toisen asteen oppilaitosten opettajille. Päätavoitteena oli esitellä 3D-tulostuksen mahdollisuuksia ja monivaiheinen työnkulku käytännön työskentelyn kautta. Lähiopetuspäivät olivat osa Opetushallituksen rahoittamaa Opettaja modernien 3D-teknologioiden osaajana -täydennyskoulutusta ja ne toteutettiin yhteistyössä Mfg4.0-hankkeen kanssa. Syksyn 2022 koulutukseen otettiin mukaan 20 henkilöä ja kevään 2023 koulutukseen paikkoja on saman verran.

 

 

Lähipäivää ennen osallistujat saivat ennakkotehtäväksi suunnitella sormuksen 3D-mallin. Sormuksen sai tehdä käyttämällä esimerkiksi ilmaista Tinkercad 3D-kappaleen piirto-ohjelmaa tai ottamalla mallin internetistä löytyvistä 3D-mallikirjastoista. Käytännönläheisen päivän aikana käytiin läpi 3D-mallin suunnittelu, tulostuksen valmistelu, tulostusprosessi ja jälkikäsittelyt. Koulutukseen osallistuvien sormukset 3D-tulostettiin muovista sekä metallista ja päivän lopuksi jokainen pääsi vielä hiomaan ja kiillottamaan oman sormuksensa.

Lähipäivään osallistujat olivat hyvin innostuneita ja motivoituneita aiheesta. Puhetta, naurua ja energiaa riitti kumpanakin päivänä aamusta iltapäivään asti. Tuntui, että jokainen osallistuja löysi 3D-tulostuksesta omanlaisensa tartuntapinnan työhönsä alasta riippumatta. Osaa motivoi uusien kurssien kehittäminen ja toisia taas 3D-tulostimen hankkiminen omaan oppilaitokseen. Toki joukossa oli niitäkin, joiden oli vaikea hahmottaa miten oppimaansa hyödyntää käytännössä. Päivä jäi heillekin palautteen mukaan positiiviseksi kokemukseksi ja asia hautumaan tulevaisuutta varten. Kouluttajien näkökulmasta oli ennen kaikkea mahtavaa, että paikalla oli innokkaita ja kysymyksiä esittäviä osallistujia, jotka ottivat aktiivisesti päivän tehtävät vastaan. Tällä saadulla kokemuksella ja positiivisella palautteella on hyvä jatkaa kohti kevään koulutuksia.

Marika Hirvimäki

projektitutkija, LUT-yliopisto

Ilkka Poutiainen

Laboratorion päällikkö , LUT-yliopisto

Shaking up TECH brings Engineering Sciences and Technology closer to girls

Shaking up TECH brings Technology and Engineering science closer to girls

Every year Aalto University, LUT University and University of Oulu will host a coordinated Shaking up Tech event, which aims to inspire young women to study technology after high school. The technology field offers many opportunities to have an impact on the world!

This year at LUT Campus Patricia Nyamekye and Aino Syväniemi of the MFG4.0 project are presenting different aspects of  3D printing world. 
But how they ended up to to work in the field of engineering sciences?
Read below their stories and insights!

Diversity for Science through AM (3D Printing): Bridging the gender career gaps.

Women and girls need to see the different options that are out there in the world and engineering. We might be losing brilliant minds to other fields simply because the information about engineering options such as additive manufacturing, more commonly 3D printing, doesn’t reach them. So shaking up TECH events are essential as they try to get those people and show the different sides of engineering. Sometimes you might not even know that it is something that fascinates you until you see and hear straight from the engineers themselves.

I don’t know if I would have ever come to study mechanical engineering if I hadn’t stumbled upon a career quiz that gave me mechanical engineering as the first choice. That quiz made me read about it, and that led me here! Even the smallest things can have a big impact.

I got interested in 3D printing through a summer job where I got to use a 3D printer. Being able to touch and handle my own designs was amazing! You rarely get that experience when designing but 3D printing makes it so easy and accessible. Shaking up TECH not only does the information about AM reach younger people better but hopefully it also shows these exciting experiences that you can have in your work life.

Additive manufacturing is a field like any other. It needs new ways of thinking and different kinds of people from different backgrounds. This way, the field can keep on expanding, and new ground-breaking inventions can be made, together. 

Women and girls need to see the different options that are out there in the world of engineering. We might be losing brilliant minds to other fields simply because the information about engineering options such as additive manufacturing, more commonly 3D printing, doesn’t reach them. Shaking up tech events are essential as they try to get those people and show the different sides of engineering. Sometimes you might not even know that it is something that fascinates you until you see and hear straight from the engineers themselves.

I don’t know if I would have ever come to study mechanical engineering if I hadn’t stumbled upon a career quiz that gave me mechanical engineering as the first choice. That quiz made me read about it, and that led me here! Even the smallest things can have a big impact.

I got interested in 3D printing through a summer job where I got to use a 3D printer. Being able to touch and handle my own designs was amazing! You rarely get that experience when designing, but 3D printing makes it easy and accessible. Shaking up TECH not only shares information about AM but also reaches younger people and hopefully shows these exciting experiences you can have in your work life.

Aino Syväniemi

Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) at LUT University

As highlighted in the report, science is one of the core enablers of achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs): “The future is now; science for achieving sustainable development.”
It has an irreplaceable role in ending hunger, tackling climate change, reducing inequality, and accelerating progress across the 17 SDGs. But, unfortunately, the scarcity of the girl child in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education has long existed for reasons such as in my case or others.

Having programs such as  Shaking up TECH is essential in attracting girls who may have the potential to pursue STEM but may be reluctant for fear of soloing or competing among boys or others. A little inspiration, encouragement, support, role modelling, and other inclusiveness can sometimes break the stereotypes in gander-career gaps. 

As a girl, I understood that science and sporty activities were only for boys. I wished to read accounting before my high school days with preconceived notions of “the bank has the easy task of money counting and bonuses.” I got enticed into science during high school in 1997 when the preferred school opted to place me in another class. No, I said to them I would not study that course. Eventually, my preferred school was changed, and as nature would have it planned, the new school’s headmaster then suggested placing me in the science class. She has “good enough grades” to pursue science,” he said. There was an ongoing national campaign to encourage more girls to study science orchestrated by the first lady in Ghana.

Luckily, in the current industrial era, “Industry 4.0”, artificial intelligence(AI), robotics, simulations, internet of things (IoT), and additive manufacturing (AM) are important levers in easing or omitting the conventional difficulties and barriers of potential science lovers. AM, for example, offers a simplified and integrated digital thread to engineer intricate designs that provide benefits similar to natural geometrical shapes, a possibility that has never existed in conventional manufacturing methods. Moreover, the capabilities of AM can be extended from everyday consumer goods like toys to high end-applications like human body implants.

Interestingly, there are different categories and several aspects of AM, such as design, materials, machine systems, software, training, education, etc., that require extensive and continuous research to bring it to the necessary academic understanding and industrial uptake. The educational sectors must introduce new subjects like AM at an early age to attract young minds to the field. Undoubtedly, AM will help achieve aspects of the 17 SDGs, particularly quality education, gender equality, responsible consumption, and production. AM enables the engineering of parts that go beyond human capacities for better resource and cost efficiency via optimized designs, customization, lead time reductions, superiority, scrap reduction, etc. Certainly, the creativeness, easiness, simplicity, and robustness, in addition to the increased part functionality offered by AM, make the process very suitable for anyone, irrespective of their gender, location, interest, etc., to design and/or manufacture products without prior experience, as a beneficiary to girl child engagement in science and technology.

I am confident to publicize that the change of course to science gave me an opportunity to contribute to students learning and the scientific, scholarly committee. I deem it a privilege to motivate young ladies to undertake science or engineering courses, including chemistry, design and manufacturing.

Patricia Nyamekye

Doctor of Science in Technology ( D.Sc. (Tech.)) , ar LUT University

Towards sustainable society -6 different viewpoints of  the MFG4.0 research presented at Strategic Research Scientific Conference

Towards sustainable society -6 different viewpoints of  the MFG4.0 research presented at Strategic Research Scientific Conference

The Strategic Research conference brings together scholars from different research fields with a common interest in exploring responses to societal challenges in a fair, just, and sustainable society. The conference will foster an exchange of ideas, approaches, and insights between the disciplines.

 

Strategic Research – Scientific Conference:
 A fair, just and sustainable society

Time

12 October 2022 – 13 October 2022

Place
Epicenter, Mikonkatu 9, Helsinki

Our researchers will present abstracts on the following themes:

Additive Manufacturing Point-of-View to Firm Resilience

Presenter:Mikael Collan

Resilience is the ability of firms to cope with sudden and dramatic changes in the business environment. Typically, firms with the flexibility to change how they operate in terms of what they produce and how they work are less vulnerable to dramatic changes than companies with fixed architectures and product assortments.

This presentation talks about the manufacturing and national resilience that is created through added manufacturing. When fleets of additive manufacturing equipment are harnessed to provide critical manufacturing in times of crisis, they are a source of resilience. This requires preparation and active orchestration.

Mikael Collan

Professor at LUT University, Director General at VATT (Institute for Economic Research)

Towards sustainability in the metal industry using 3D printing

Presenter: Jyrki Savolainen
Co-authors: Ilkka Poutiainen, Marika Hirvimäki, Kari Ullakko, Ville Laitinen

The interest in additive manufacturing (AM), commonly known as 3D printing, has grown enormously over the last decade. AM is a novel way to produce unique parts offering new business opportunities and improved environmental sustainability of production. The current literature on AM emphasizes its positive effects on the sustainability of global production supply chains. We claim that the AM design and production can either positively or negatively influence the final product’s overall cost and resource efficiency.

Metal powders for AM are expensive, and manufacturing these powders consumes significantly more energy than sheet or bar materials. In this paper, we discuss how cost-effectiveness and sustainability are achieved when parts are redesigned using, e.g., lattice structures, an optimal printing position, and minimizing the need for post-processing.

Jyrki Savolainen

Post Doctoral Researcher at LUT University

Towards General Theory of Sustainable Development: Systematic Digital Twin Operationalisation of the Grand Sustainability Theory

Presenter: Jari Kaivo-oja

Co-authors: Jyrki Luukkanen, Jarmo Vehmas & Tadht O ́MahonyAcross decades of contemporary discussion on sustainable development, a core debate has concerned whether economic growth can be made sustainable, environmentally and socially.
In recent years, this has become a debate about economic growth versus economic degrowth, whether the former can be environmentally sustainable and whether the latter can be socially sustainable. In the presentation, the author presents the general theory of sustainable growth and development and links the use of the model to the development challenges of digital twins.

This developed theory can be used in national sustainability assessment and planning, as well as in regional policy or urban planning. The model forms the core of sustainable development or sustainability science.

Jari Kaivo-oja

Research Director, Dr, Adjunct Professorat University of Turku

Towards a Sustainable Portfolio Theory - Foresight-driven strategic asset allocation and SDG (Sustainable Development Goals) alignment

Presenter: Ville Korpela
Co-authors: Jari Kaivo-oja, Arne Fagerström & Petri Kuusisto

Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) has formed the core theoretical basis for asset allocation strategies of institutional investors for several decades. Recently, there have been wider calls among practitioners and the academic community to extend the existing theory to include broader impacts on the societal level to align investment practices globally with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In the paper, we discuss an outline for a sustainable portfolio theory (SPT) by extending the existing modern portfolio theory (MPT). Our objective is to demonstrate a relationship between the values businesses create and the impact investors are capturing.

Ville Korpela

PhD Researcher, Turku School of Economics, University of Turku

Visionary-Thinking in Sustainable Industrial Development in Finland - The Case of Allied ICT Finland ́s Vision-Building Processy

Presenter: Mikkel Knudsen
Co-authors: Jari Kaivo-oja & Tero Villman

Europe must renew itself to retain its 35 million industrial jobs in an increasingly fierce global competition. The industrial renewal must happen in concerto with bold ambitions for the twin, green and digital transitions, and it must be executed within the modern VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity) decision environment. Our research highlights potential pathways for Finnish industry and steps for the Finnish government, businesses, and society. Based on the visioning process, Industry 6.0 is defined as “ubiquitous, customer-driven, virtualized, antifragile manufacturing”. It is characterized by customer-centric, highly customized lot-size-1 thinking and by hyper-connected factories with dynamic supply chains and data flows across domains.

Mikkel Knudsen

Project Researcher, Finland Futures Research Centre (FFRC) M.Sc. (Pol. Science) University of Turku

The challenges of long-term development for Finnish education and education policy to meet the demands of Manufacturing 4.0

Presenter: Maarit Virolainen
Co-author: Juhani Rautopuro

The so-called Manufacturing 4.0, sets needs to reform education, and they relate to the following three points: (1) to define, picture, and design what kind of reforms and for which parts of the education system and curricula are needed to instil fair, just and sustainable society and adapt to the change of technology in society, (2) to assess and evaluate, if the targeted change has been met in the learning of various learner groups before and after the reform. The presentation discusses the latest reforms in education and the role of research in identifying developmental education needs.

Maarit Virolainen

Project Researcher PhD (Adult education), MA (Social sciences) at University of Jyväskylä

Onko onnellinen kansa myös osaava kansa?

Onko onnellinen kansa on myös osaava kansa?

Suomalaiset ovat maailman onnellisin kansa. Myös suomalaista koulutusjärjestelmää on luonnehdittu yhdeksi maailman parhaista ja varsinkin nuoret ovat menestyneet hyvin oppimistulosten kansainvälisissä vertailevissa tutkimuksissa.

 

Miten hyvin mahtaa oppi kantaa myöhemmässä elämässä? Ovatko aikuisväestön perustaidot sillä tasolla kuin työ- ja arkielämässä menestyminen tietoyhteiskunnassa edellyttää? Opettaako työ tekijäänsä ja tuetaanko työelämässä toimivien ammattitaitoa globalisaation ja digitalisaation myllerryksessä? Onko oppi kenties kaatunut ojaan?

 

Suomalaisen aikuisväestön tietojen ja taitojen tasoa on toki kartoitettu. Vuosina 2011-2012 toteutetussa kansainvälisessä aikuistutkimuksessa PIAAC (Cycle1) saatiin kansainvälisesti vertailukelpoista tietoa aikuisväestön (16-65 -vuotiaat) perustaidoista ja niiden käytöstä. Tutkimuksessa selvitettiin sitä, kuinka hyvin aikuiset hallitsevat arkielämässäkin tärkeitä perustaitoja kuten lukutaito, numerotaito ja tietotekniikkaa soveltava ongelmanratkaisutaito. Tutkimuksessa kartoitettiin myös aikuisväestön koulutusta, työkokemusta ja taitojen soveltamista työssä ja vapaa-ajalla.

 

Noin kymmen vuotta sitten suomalaiset aikuiset menestyivät kansainvälisessä kisassa mainiosti. Kaikkiaan 24 osallistujamaan joukossa Suomi oli mitalisijoilla kaikissa kolmessa testatussa osa-alueessa: lukutaidossa sekä numerotaidossa sijoitus oli toinen ja ongelmanratkaisutaidossa irtosi kolmas sija.

Esimerkki PIAAC-tehtävästä

Hyvästä menestyksestä huolimatta pohdittavaakin jäi. Ikäryhmien välillä oli huomattavia eroja ja esimerkiksi tietotekniikkaa soveltavassa ongelmanratkaisutaidoissa Suomessa oli muihin kärkimaihin verrattuna paljon sellaisia vastaajia, jotka eivät halunneet tai pystyneet käyttämään tietokonetta tehtävien tekemiseen lainkaan.

Mikä mahtaa olla tilanne tänään? Aikuisten kansainvälinen taitotutkimus PIAAC (Cycle2) toteutetaan jälleen vuosina 2022–2023. Tutkimukseen osallistuu 32 maata. Koronapandemia viivästytti tutkimuksen toteuttamista yhdellä vuodella. Edellisen kierroksen tapaan tutkimuksessa kartoitetaan perustaidoista luku- ja numerotaitoa. Ongelmanratkaisutaito keskittyy tällä kierroksella ongelman määrittelemiseen, tarvittavan tiedon hakemiseen ja sen käyttämiseen ongelman ratkaisemiseksi.

PIAAC-tutkimuksen Suomen osuuden rahoittavat Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriö sekä Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö. Tutkimuksen toteutuksesta vastaavat Jyväskylän yliopiston Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos sekä Tilastokeskus. Tutkimus on melkoinen ponnistus, sillä kohdejoukkona on aikuisväestö, eli 16 – 65 -vuotiaat Suomessa asuvat henkilöt (populaatio n. 3,5 miljoonaa henkilöä). Otoskoko on 8 400 henkilöä ja otannan toteuttaa Tilastokeskus.

Päätutkimuksen tiedonkeruu on alkanut syyskuun alussa ja suomalaisilla on jälleen kerran ’näytön paikka’ niin itselleen kuin myös muille osallistujamaille.

Juhani Rautopuro

tutkimusprofessori, Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos,
Jyväskylän yliopisto

Koulutusjärjestelmät ja yhteiskunta -painoalueen johtaja Koulutuksen arvioinnin dosentti (Helsingin yliopisto)


Rautopuro johtaa ryhmää, joka vastaa kaikkien tärkeimpien kansainvälisten arviointitutkimusten (mm. Pisa, PIRLS, TIMSS) toteutuksesta Suomessa sekä on PIAACin kansallinen tutkimusjohtaja.

Tutkimusprofessori Juhani Rautopuro on 28.9.22 klo 09.30 mukana Tilastolivessä, jossa käsitellään PIAAC-tutkimusta

PIAAC eli Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies


Tutkitaan maailmanlaajuisesti 16-65 —vuotiaiden osaamista.
.
Satunnaisotanta edustaa mahdollisimman hyvin kunkin osallistujamaan väestöä.

Tutkimuksen tarkoitus on selvittää aikuisten tietoa perustaidoista ja niiden käytöstä.

Viimeisimpään, vuoden 2011-2012 PIACC-tutkimukseen osallistui Suomessa noin 5600 aikuista (ositettu otoskoko 8000). Maailmanlaajuisesti mukana oli noin 157 000 henkilöä 24 maasta.

Vuonna 2022-2023 toteutettavan tutkimuksen ositettu otoskoko on Suomessa 8400 ja koko tutkimuksen 160 000 – 170 000 aikuista 32 maasta.

The ‘Pyramid model’ helps to tune your organization and business models to take advantage of technological innovations

The ‘Pyramid model’ helps to tune your organization and business models to take advantage of technological innovations

Monetization of technological innovation necessitates adjustments to the organization, business model(s), and even ecosystems. How to make money with the innovation or how it contributes to profit generation must be clear. If innovation activity has been business need-driven, you might already have an idea of that. If innovation has been technology-driven i.e., you have developed or tested new technology to understand what could be done, you need to form an understanding of how to monetize it in your case.

Mikko Hirvonen


Strategy advisor & Researcher,
LUT University

Regardless of the driver of innovation, the prerequisite for successful monetization is an alignment of a business strategy and business model(s). When strategy and business model choices are done, it’s time to look at the ‘set of organizational capabilities’ needed to run the business and to meet the strategic objectives. For example, in a case of product innovation, you might need new or adjusted capabilities to commercialize and manufacture it, and to ensure that the customer gains the expected value. At the same time, you and your business partners need to be able to capture enough value that motivates to continue doing business.

The ‘Pyramid model’ is a framework to support this – often quite complex task to realize business benefits from different types of innovation (be it a product, process, organization, or business model innovation) and to monetary value of it. With the ‘Pyramid model’ the organization and its business model(s), where competitive advantage is potentially created, are broken down to a set of organizational capabilities and further into interconnected capability elements.

Depending on the type of innovation, it changes one or more of the capability elements. The ‘Pyramid model helps to identify required adjustments to interdependent capability elements to achieve targeted capability with expected outcomes, but also interconnected capabilities to gain business benefits on business model level and to ultimately monetize the innovation.

The ‘Pyramid model’ is expected to be of significant value to the practitioners when directing innovation efforts and designing value configuration, and organizations and ecosystems around it. For researchers it provides a novel framework for research serving the practice.

Hirvonen, Mikko H. (2022). Pyramid model – Conceptualizing an organizational capability to design IT investments. Proceedings of the 15th IADIS International Conference Information Systems. Virtual Conference 12-14 March 2022.  

Keywords

Pyramid model, business models, business model innovation, business model framework, capabilities, capability system